This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.araujo
Recipients benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, mark.dickinson
Date 2011-04-30.15:43:23
SpamBayes Score 2.8401832e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1304178205.97.0.319156485187.issue11963@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I’ve always found strange that one test relied on visual (i.e. human) checking instead of using an assert* method.  I changed it and found that the test still passed (see attached patch).  Is there any reason to do it the old way?
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-30 15:43:26eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, mark.dickinson, benjamin.peterson
2011-04-30 15:43:25eric.araujosetmessageid: <1304178205.97.0.319156485187.issue11963@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-04-30 15:43:23eric.araujolinkissue11963 messages
2011-04-30 15:43:23eric.araujocreate