This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients Trundle, daniel.urban, docs@python, eric.araujo, jonathan.hartley, mjs0, rhettinger, terry.reedy
Date 2011-04-09.00:22:09
SpamBayes Score 6.4531782e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1302308530.88.0.0436116215518.issue11796@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Devs are aware that there is an exception to the general rule for the 'for' clause. There is a technical reason why the exception is possible, though I have forgotten it.

Since you already know that changing the general behavior has been rejected, are you asking that the exception be removed (for consistency) , so that your first example would fail? If so, that will be rejected also.

I am changing this to a doc issue in case you or someone else wishes to suggest a doc improvement.

The solution to the limitation on generator expressions, of course, is to write out the generator one is trying to abbreviate.

def clipper(max):
    for i in range(5):
        if i < max:
            yield i

class Foo:
    x = 3
    y = list(clipper(x))

print(Foo.y)
# [0, 1, 2]
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-09 00:22:10terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, rhettinger, eric.araujo, Trundle, jonathan.hartley, daniel.urban, docs@python, mjs0
2011-04-09 00:22:10terry.reedysetmessageid: <1302308530.88.0.0436116215518.issue11796@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-04-09 00:22:10terry.reedylinkissue11796 messages
2011-04-09 00:22:09terry.reedycreate