Message132602
> Antoine, absolument. Please see attached file bug.py
Ah, thanks, I see. But this is not caused by this issue.
It seems to come from 12442ac3f7dd.
> Instead we should simply define it for python, and in accordance to
> established tradition, namely that defaulttimeout prevails.
That would be the second behaviour change in two versions. I think we
could/should simply fix the advertised behaviour, as in
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/socket.html#timeouts-and-the-accept-method
> Btw, defaulttimeout(None) doesn't mean that that there is no default,
> it means that the default is "blocking."
Sure, but generally it means that the user didn't *set* a default at
all. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-30 18:54:47 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, ronaldoussoren, exarkun, roysmith, kristjan.jonsson, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, stutzbach, nicdumz, bbangert, Justin.Cappos, rosslagerwall |
2011-03-30 18:54:43 | pitrou | link | issue7995 messages |
2011-03-30 18:54:43 | pitrou | create | |
|