Message131729
fixing this for the next version of course would be acceptable.
As I can use the extension (not setting Py_LIMITED_API) even with 3.2.0 it is not a big problem. I only loose the benefit of Py_LIMITED_API and will have to release another version of the binding later on.
> Would you prefer to see a compiler error indicating that you are using
> a function not available in 3.2.0 (with an option of opting into
> 3.2.1+)?
I fear I don't understand exactly what is meant here. For me it was enough to get the linker error telling me it is not working. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-22 09:21:52 | rjs | set | recipients:
+ rjs, loewis |
2011-03-22 09:21:52 | rjs | set | messageid: <1300785712.91.0.635985427936.issue11626@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-03-22 09:21:52 | rjs | link | issue11626 messages |
2011-03-22 09:21:52 | rjs | create | |
|