This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients alexandre.vassalotti, belopolsky, cool-RR, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, exarkun, hinsen, lemburg, loewis, obamausa8, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2011-03-01.21:08:49
SpamBayes Score 5.615634e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1299013726.3709.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1299013399.37.0.8184603845.issue9276@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> To have a non-hackish patch we need a non-hackish idea. The
> `.__parent_class__` idea looks hackish to me, but now that I think
> about it, how is it more hackish than a function's `.__module__`
> attribute?

Not much, agreed. You might want to call it `__namespace__` instead if
you want it to look cleaner :)
(and it could be useful for other purposes such as e.g. introspection)

But by "hackish" I meant the possible implementation of it, not the idea
itself. That's what a patch would help assess.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-03-01 21:08:50pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, loewis, rhettinger, hinsen, exarkun, belopolsky, alexandre.vassalotti, eric.araujo, obamausa8, daniel.urban, cool-RR
2011-03-01 21:08:49pitroulinkissue9276 messages
2011-03-01 21:08:49pitroucreate