Message129175
> > So, IMO, practicality beats purity here. Especially since it is bound to
> > land in a bugfix release (3.2.1), which users don't expect to produce
> > regressions in their own code.
>
> Nope. Your suggestion would be a new feature and those are not
> allowed in patch level releases.
What new feature are you talking about? I think you misunderstood the
actual issue: NULL as an empty string *worked* in 3.1 and that's why we
have a regression with _pickle here.
So, in the end, you are the one proposing a change in actual behaviour,
while I'm trying to minimize changes (and breakage). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-02-23 11:37:23 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, lemburg, georg.brandl, jcea, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, belopolsky |
2011-02-23 11:37:22 | pitrou | link | issue11286 messages |
2011-02-23 11:37:22 | pitrou | create | |
|