Message122013
> I got into this by starting with Issue7322, which reports a scenario
> where data is lost using makefile(). The docs for makefile() say,
> "The socket must be in blocking mode (it can not have a timeout)".
> So, we've got published documentation which equates non-blocking mode
> with a timeout set.
This wording goes back to r54491, from issue882297. Facundo writes
# If the socket is in blocking mode, it can NOT have a timeout.
# I fixed the docs, and made that explicit.
so I don't think he really meant to equate the two. I'm not a native
speaker (of English), so I'll refrain from proposing an alternative
wording. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-21 22:57:19 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, ronaldoussoren, exarkun, roysmith, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, nicdumz, bbangert, Justin.Cappos |
2010-11-21 22:57:17 | loewis | link | issue7995 messages |
2010-11-21 22:57:17 | loewis | create | |
|