This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author orsenthil
Recipients brunogola, endian, gregory.p.smith, orsenthil, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, yangman
Date 2010-11-21.15:50:44
SpamBayes Score 8.55033e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20101121154915.GA8671@rubuntu>
In-reply-to <1290352506.83.0.698055530609.issue3709@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 03:15:06PM +0000, R. David Murray wrote:
> Senthil, I didn't clearly express my concern about
> send_response_only.  It doesn't look to me like, with buffering in
> place, that it *should* write directly, it looks to me like it
> should write to the buffer.

Correct. Now that I re-looked at the code, keeping your above
statement in mind", I tend to agree with you and notice the problem. I
think, the headers_buffer should be moved higher up in the class so
that it buffer the headers from all these methods which atm write
directly to the output stream.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-21 15:50:47orsenthilsetrecipients: + orsenthil, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, brunogola, yangman, r.david.murray, endian
2010-11-21 15:50:45orsenthillinkissue3709 messages
2010-11-21 15:50:44orsenthilcreate