➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients brian.curtin, casevh, eric.smith, jjconti, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, skrah
Date 2010-11-07.12:30:58
SpamBayes Score 0.00026087445
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTinwzzie6-4Fxd2tjV-3oPJCmK_fLv8aN-mxF2Az@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1288754888.21.0.493810987272.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Case Van Horsen <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Has the cdecimal branch kept up with the hash value changes in 3.2?

Not sure;  that's a question for Stefan.

> Is there a still a chance that cdecimal could be merged into 3.2?

A chance, yes;  the major need is for someone with time to do a full
review.  (I'm afraid that's not me, right now.)
History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-07 12:30:59mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, rhettinger, casevh, eric.smith, jjconti, brian.curtin, skrah
2010-11-07 12:30:58mark.dickinsonlinkissue7652 messages
2010-11-07 12:30:58mark.dickinsoncreate