Message119258
Thanks for noticing this. I wasn't aware that it had slowed down after dotted name support had been added.
Since it is a mild performance issue, I'm lowering the priority. Will take a further look when I get the chance. A first look at the patch shows that it is bigger than I expected. Isn't it possible to check for a dot on construction and just record the boolean so that a fast, non-splitting path can be used.
I'm reluctant to make the code volume grow much for this function. It is already a bit voluminous for the minor convenience it offers. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-10-21 02:04:14 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, tzot, docs@python |
2010-10-21 02:04:13 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1287626653.86.0.185298691453.issue10160@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-10-21 02:03:57 | rhettinger | link | issue10160 messages |
2010-10-21 02:03:56 | rhettinger | create | |
|