➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author hagen
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, dangyogi, hagen, kcarnold, terry.reedy
Date 2010-08-05.08:55:49
SpamBayes Score 1.7836128e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1280998551.66.0.164203865956.issue4806@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
IIUC, the only change you suggest for my patch is using "finite iterable" instead of "sequence" or "iterable", right?

I've looked at the docs and there seems to be no precedent for "finite iterable". I think it's just as obvious that the iterable has to yield a correct (and finite) number of parameters as the fact that "list(itertools.count())" is a bad idea. So for consistency I would like to keep "iterable".
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-05 08:55:51hagensetrecipients: + hagen, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, dangyogi, kcarnold
2010-08-05 08:55:51hagensetmessageid: <1280998551.66.0.164203865956.issue4806@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-05 08:55:49hagenlinkissue4806 messages
2010-08-05 08:55:49hagencreate