➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author belopolsky
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2010-07-02.23:09:22
SpamBayes Score 0.0011554373
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTinhYGpxQv2rhjTJmlahR0jXvqKOzBRuaNMa3Hfg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <4C2E6DAD.1010004@egenix.com>
Content 
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> That said, I don't think redesigning the datetime module is part
> of this ticket, just adding a second implementation of what we
> already have in CPython :-)

I agree.  I am just looking for an excuse not to change attributes
like __year to _year.  :-)
History
Date User Action Args
2010-07-02 23:09:24belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, tim.peters, brett.cannon, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban
2010-07-02 23:09:22belopolskylinkissue7989 messages
2010-07-02 23:09:22belopolskycreate