Message108248
> It might be nice to see the version that avoids the dup() and has the
> duplicate code instead (interesting trade-off ;). Just for the sake of
> comparison against the forget() proposal.
Here it is. There's probably a bit of polishing left to do, in the (unlikely) case this is chosen as a solution. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-06-20 20:51:54 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, exarkun, janssen, giampaolo.rodola |
2010-06-20 20:51:54 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1277067114.16.0.801444034249.issue8524@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-06-20 20:51:52 | pitrou | link | issue8524 messages |
2010-06-20 20:51:52 | pitrou | create | |
|