➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients akr, barry, benjamin.peterson, dmalcolm, glyph, gregory.p.smith, iankko, loewis, pitrou, psss, thoger
Date 2010-05-04.14:09:48
SpamBayes Score 0.00021848881
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1272982331.3554.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1272975478.47.0.550869653118.issue5753@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
> Can anyone move this to Stage: patch review (for the fix approach
> proposed in msg90336)?  Or does anyone have better idea on how to move
> this closer to final fix or wontfix / reject?  Thank you!

I stand by my opinion that adding another hack in the initialization
path will not do us a lot of good, while a separate API would solve the
problem neatly. Perhaps Dave Malcolm can chime in?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-05-04 14:09:49pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, barry, gregory.p.smith, benjamin.peterson, glyph, psss, iankko, akr, thoger, dmalcolm
2010-05-04 14:09:48pitroulinkissue5753 messages
2010-05-04 14:09:48pitroucreate