Author techtonik
Recipients ajaksu2, daniel.urban, l0nwlf, merwok, techtonik
Date 2010-04-28.21:40:27
SpamBayes Score 0.00357536
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1272490829.4.0.477889166774.issue7584@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I do not think that -00:00 or +00:00 will be invalid Atom timestamp, but to implement parser of rfc3339 timestamp, Z handling is still needed. I can easily imagine people making wrong assumption that parsing 00:00 at the end would be enough for proper round-tripping.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-04-28 21:40:29techtoniksetrecipients: + techtonik, ajaksu2, merwok, daniel.urban, l0nwlf
2010-04-28 21:40:29techtoniksetmessageid: <1272490829.4.0.477889166774.issue7584@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-04-28 21:40:27techtoniklinkissue7584 messages
2010-04-28 21:40:27techtonikcreate