Message102239
Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
> Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Here's a new patch. Should be complete but I want to test it some more before committing.
> I decided to follow RFC 3629, putting 0 instead of 5/6 for bytes in range F5-FD (we can always put them back in the unlikely case that the Unicode Consortium changed its mind) and also for other invalid ranges (e.g. C0-C1). This lead to some simplification in the code.
Ok.
> I also found out that, according to RFC 3629, surrogates are considered invalid and they can't be encoded/decoded, but the UTF-8 codec actually does it. I included tests and fix but I left them commented out because this is out of the scope of this patch, and it probably need a discussion on python-dev.
Right, but that idea is controversial. In Python we need to be able to
put those surrogate code points into source code (encoded as UTF-8) as
well as pickle and marshal dumps of Unicode object dumps, so we can't
consider them invalid UTF-8. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-03 11:41:36 | lemburg | set | recipients:
+ lemburg, sjmachin, ezio.melotti, dangra |
2010-04-03 11:41:34 | lemburg | link | issue8271 messages |
2010-04-03 11:41:33 | lemburg | create | |
|