Created on 2010-07-18 01:51 by Geraldo.Xexeo, last changed 2010-07-20 14:42 by taleinat.
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg110621 - (view) | Author: Geraldo Xexeo (Geraldo.Xexeo) | Date: 2010-07-18 01:51 | |
The fact that in IDLE sys.stdin is a idlelib.rpc.RPCProxy results in programs having different behavior in IDLE and in Command Line mode. I noticed that when grading many students exercises in IDLE. Things like: sys.stdin.readlines() just don´t exists in IDLE, but are fully operational in Command Line mode. In Command Line mode, sys.stdin is a file. This is expected, as the manual (27.1) says that sys.stdin (and stdout and stderrr) are "File objects corresponding to the interpreter’s standard input" There are also other "quirks". I fell that is really strange that stdin has different behavior for the same program. |
|||
| msg110904 - (view) | Author: Tal Einat (taleinat) ![]() |
Date: 2010-07-20 14:42 | |
I agree that the wrapping of these in IDLE should be as transparent as possible. It would be helpful if you could specify what other "quirks" you have found regarding sys.stdin, sys.stdout and sys.stderr, preferably describing use cases where these are problematic. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-20 14:42:59 | taleinat | set | nosy:
+ taleinat messages: + msg110904 |
| 2010-07-18 01:51:33 | Geraldo.Xexeo | create | |