➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2010-07-09 09:15 by amaury.forgeotdarc, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| kill-wctype.patch | amaury.forgeotdarc, 2010-07-09 11:43 | don't forget to regenerate "configure" | ||
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg109696 - (view) | Author: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc (amaury.forgeotdarc) *  |
Date: 2010-07-09 09:15 | |
Quoting Marc-Andre Lemburg: """ The support for the wctype functions should have been remove long ago, since they cause subtle incompatibilities between Python builds. I should have probably never added it in the first place... people were worried about the size of the type record tables at the time, which is why I thought it would be a good idea to try to optionally use the C lib functions. The comment was true before the Python type tables were changed into a type record database: the switch used to remove the Python tables required for those functions. With the type records database, this is no longer the case, since the records are also being used for properties that are not exposed via wctype functions. """ |
|||
| msg109715 - (view) | Author: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc (amaury.forgeotdarc) * |
Date: 2010-07-09 11:43 | |
Patch attached. |
|||
| msg109718 - (view) | Author: Marc-Andre Lemburg (lemburg) * |
Date: 2010-07-09 11:54 | |
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote: > > Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amauryfa@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Patch attached. Thanks. The patch looks good and I'd be +1 on applying it. The only problem I see is that we may have to follow the deprecation process. OTOH, I've announce the plan in 2004 and confirmed it again in 2005: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-December/050193.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-April/052989.html |
|||
| msg116118 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2010-09-11 20:43 | |
I would say, go ahead and apply for 3.2. |
|||
| msg116240 - (view) | Author: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc (amaury.forgeotdarc) * |
Date: 2010-09-12 22:43 | |
Applied in r84752. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:03 | admin | set | github: 53456 |
| 2010-09-12 22:43:35 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | status: open -> closed resolution: accepted -> fixed messages: + msg116240 stage: resolved |
| 2010-09-12 21:58:33 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | assignee: amaury.forgeotdarc resolution: accepted |
| 2010-09-11 21:59:30 | flox | link | issue9832 superseder |
| 2010-09-11 20:45:11 | eric.araujo | set | nosy:
+ eric.araujo |
| 2010-09-11 20:43:50 | georg.brandl | set | priority: normal -> critical nosy: + georg.brandl messages: + msg116118 |
| 2010-07-12 15:51:03 | pitrou | link | issue1076790 superseder |
| 2010-07-09 11:54:34 | lemburg | set | messages: + msg109718 |
| 2010-07-09 11:43:43 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | files:
+ kill-wctype.patch keywords: + patch messages: + msg109715 |
| 2010-07-09 09:15:15 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |