This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Unsupported provider

classification
Title: ssl.read/write on closed socket raises AttributeError
Type: enhancement Stage: resolved
Components: Library (Lib) Versions: Python 3.4
process
Status: closed Resolution: fixed
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: Nosy List: cbay, ezio.melotti, pitrou, python-dev, senko, vstinner
Priority: normal Keywords: patch

Created on 2010-07-06 09:52 by cbay, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
ssl-socket-readwrite-after-close.diff senko, 2013-07-07 13:48 review
Messages (9)
msg109379 - (view) Author: Cyril (cbay) Date: 2010-07-06 09:52
This:

import socket, ssl

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
ssl_sock = ssl.wrap_socket(s)
ssl_sock.connect(('www.verisign.com', 443))
ssl_sock.close()
ssl_sock.read(1024)

raises:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/bug.py", line 10, in <module>
    ssl_sock.read(1024)
  File "/path/to/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 138, in read
    return self._sslobj.read(len)
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'read'


I would expect a socket.error instead, which mimics the way regular sockets behave. Indeed, this code:

import socket, ssl

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect(('www.verisign.com', 80))
s.close()
s.recv(1024)

raises:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/bug.py", line 6, in <module>
    s.recv(1024)
  File "/path/to/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 170, in _dummy
    raise error(EBADF, 'Bad file descriptor')
socket.error: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor


I've tested on the latest trunks on both 2.7 and 3.2. I've also tested on 2.6 and 3.1.

I can write a patch that fixes it if the bug is accepted.
msg160140 - (view) Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * (Python committer) Date: 2012-05-07 11:41
I don't think mimicking EBADF is very useful. Reading from a closed socket is usually a programming error, so it's not the kind of error you'll want to catch at runtime.

AttributeError may not be very pretty though, so perhaps a ValueError can be raised as with closed files:

>>> f = open("LICENSE")
>>> f.close()
>>> f.read()
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file.
msg192556 - (view) Author: Senko Rasic (senko) * Date: 2013-07-07 13:48
Here's a patch that adds checks and ValueError raises to SSLSocket.read and SSLSocket.write.

My first attempt was to add the check to _checkClosed to mirror the IOBase._checkClosed, but in SSLSocket its semantics are different (the idea is for the subclass to add custom checks if needed), and it's called from a lot of places that do gracefully handle closed sockets.

So I opted to add it manually to only the read and write methods (which allowed for more specific error messages).
msg193275 - (view) Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-07-18 09:50
Thanks for the patch, I will take a look.
msg193334 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-07-18 23:36
ssl-socket-readwrite-after-close.diff: instead of testing "not self._sslobj", I would prefer an explicit "self._sslobj is None".
msg193335 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-07-18 23:38
The check should be moved into the _checkClosed() method. Example:

def _checkClosed(self):
    io.RawIOBase._checkClosed(self)
    if self._sslobj is None:
        raise ValueError("I/O operation on closed SSL socket")
msg193336 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-07-18 23:41
Oops, remove "io.RawIOBase._checkClosed(self)" from my example (I read socket.py at the same time, SSLSocket inherits from socket, not from RawIOBase).
msg193415 - (view) Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) (Python triager) Date: 2013-07-20 17:35
New changeset eda7e86bf03c by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default':
Issue #9177: Calling read() or write() now raises ValueError, not AttributeError, on a closed SSL socket.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eda7e86bf03c
msg193417 - (view) Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-07-20 17:39
Ok, I tweaked the error message a bit: _sslobj can also be None when unwrap() has been called on the socket.
Thank you for contribution!
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:57:03adminsetgithub: 53423
2013-07-20 17:39:24pitrousetstatus: open -> closed
resolution: fixed
messages: + msg193417

stage: patch review -> resolved
2013-07-20 17:35:32python-devsetnosy: + python-dev
messages: + msg193415
2013-07-18 23:41:29vstinnersetmessages: + msg193336
2013-07-18 23:38:52vstinnersetmessages: + msg193335
2013-07-18 23:36:28vstinnersetnosy: + vstinner
messages: + msg193334
2013-07-18 09:50:00pitrousetstage: needs patch -> patch review
messages: + msg193275
versions: + Python 3.4, - Python 3.3
2013-07-07 13:48:52senkosetfiles: + ssl-socket-readwrite-after-close.diff

nosy: + senko
messages: + msg192556

keywords: + patch
2012-05-07 11:41:34pitrousettype: behavior -> enhancement
messages: + msg160140
versions: - Python 2.7, Python 3.2
2012-05-07 11:19:11ezio.melottisetnosy: + pitrou, ezio.melotti
stage: needs patch

versions: + Python 3.3, - Python 2.6, Python 3.1
2010-07-06 09:52:58cbaycreate