This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: test message
Type: Stage: resolved
Components: Versions:
process
Status: closed Resolution: not a bug
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: Nosy List: ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, skip.montanaro
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2010-03-05 14:22 by skip.montanaro, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (4)
msg100480 - (view) Author: Skip Montanaro (skip.montanaro) * (Python triager) Date: 2010-03-05 14:22
I don't know where this will go given that it's not a response to an
existing bug report.  I'm looking to see if the SpamBayes instance on
mail.python.org processes this message.

Someone please respond to let me know if this address is working properly
again w.r.t. spam filtering.

Thanks,

Skip
msg100481 - (view) Author: Ezio Melotti (ezio.melotti) * (Python committer) Date: 2010-03-05 14:26
It seems it went in the right place.
This message has a SpamBayes Score of 0.00451466.
msg100484 - (view) Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * (Python committer) Date: 2010-03-05 15:10
Does this mean you think you've fixed whatever was causing metatracker bug 320? (http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue320).
msg100489 - (view) Author: Skip Montanaro (skip.montanaro) * (Python triager) Date: 2010-03-05 16:18
I don't know, but it's quite possible.  Lots of messages were held for
moderation.  It's possible that some were rejected as spam.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:56:58adminsetgithub: 52318
2010-03-05 16:18:25skip.montanarosetmessages: + msg100489
2010-03-05 15:10:59r.david.murraysetnosy: + r.david.murray
messages: + msg100484
2010-03-05 14:26:07ezio.melottisetstatus: open -> closed

nosy: + ezio.melotti
messages: + msg100481

resolution: not a bug
stage: resolved
2010-03-05 14:22:50skip.montanarocreate