Issue633930
Created on 2002-11-05 17:56 by gvanrossum, last changed 2007-03-10 18:21 by gvanrossum.
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg13078 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) | Date: 2002-11-05 17:56 | |
The __name__ attribute of a nested class should be set to 'outer.inner', both for classic and for new-style classes. E.g. >>> class C: ... class C1: pass ... >>> C.C1.__name__ 'C.C1' >>> |
|||
| msg13079 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) | Date: 2002-11-14 23:13 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=6380 Hm, but should this also be done for functions inside classes? E.g. class C: def foo(self): pass assert C.foo.__name__ == "C.foo" assert C.__dict__["foo"].__name__ == "C.foo" And what about classes inside functions? def f(): class C: pass return C assert f().__name__ == "f.C" ??? |
|||
| msg13080 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) | Date: 2003-02-11 23:01 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=6380 I'm less sure I even want this now, and not at all sure how to do it any more, so lowering priority. |
|||
| msg13081 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) | Date: 2007-03-10 07:22 | |
Any interest for Python 3000 on this? Otherwise we can close it. |
|||
| msg13082 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) | Date: 2007-03-10 18:21 | |
I don't think so. Closing. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2002-11-05 17:56:34 | gvanrossum | create | |