Created on 2002-05-21 16:10 by nascheme, last changed 2004-02-10 21:29 by tim_one. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| untrack_simple.diff | nascheme, 2002-05-21 16:10 | |||
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg40073 - (view) | Author: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) *  |
Date: 2002-05-21 16:10 | |
This patch makes the GC untrack tuples that contain no GC objects. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to help much. The time for the 'storetups' case of iterzip.py seems be about twice as fast (matching Daniel Dunbar result). Loading a number of complex MEMS Exchange web pages causes the size of gen2 to go up to 120000 instead of 134000 without the patch. This change doesn't seem to be worth making. |
|||
| msg40074 - (view) | Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) * |
Date: 2003-04-12 01:16 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=33168 Neil, are you still interested in this patch? |
|||
| msg40075 - (view) | Author: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) * |
Date: 2003-04-12 13:43 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=35752 I'm not since it doesn't seem to help much. It looks like no one else is either. Closing it. |
|||
| msg40076 - (view) | Author: Tim Peters (tim_one) * |
Date: 2003-04-13 05:23 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Unassigned. I agree with closing it, BTW -- it wasn't hot or cold, it just seemed so neutral it was depressing <wink>. |
|||
| msg40077 - (view) | Author: Tim Peters (tim_one) * |
Date: 2004-02-10 21:29 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Assigned to Jeremy, cuz he wants to reconsider this. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2002-05-21 16:10:46 | nascheme | create | |