➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2009-03-23 00:21 by LambertDW, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg83990 - (view) | Author: David W. Lambert (LambertDW) | Date: 2009-03-23 00:21 | |
See thread http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/85e c714aa6898d84# En Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:12:13 -0300, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> escribió: > Gabriel Genellina <gagsl-py2 <at> yahoo.com.ar> writes: >> The undocumented behavior is relying on the open() builtin to return a >> BufferedReader for a binary file. > I don't see the problem. open() will return some BufferedIOBase > implmentor, and > that's all that TextIOWrapper needs. How do you know? AFAIK, the return value of open() is completely undocumented: http://docs.python.org/3.0/library/functions.html#open And if you open the file in text mode, the return value isn't a BufferedIOBase. -- Gabriel Genellina The return value of open() is a "stream", according to http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/library/io.html#module-io |
|||
| msg83995 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2009-03-23 02:39 | |
Fixed in r70534. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:46 | admin | set | github: 49789 |
| 2009-03-23 02:39:06 | benjamin.peterson | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + benjamin.peterson messages: + msg83995 resolution: fixed |
| 2009-03-23 00:26:01 | LambertDW | set | assignee: georg.brandl nosy: + georg.brandl components: + Documentation versions: + Python 3.0 |
| 2009-03-23 00:21:44 | LambertDW | create | |