➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2002-03-21 20:17 by sidlon, last changed 2022-04-10 16:05 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (8) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg53510 - (view) | Author: Michael McFarland (sidlon) | Date: 2002-03-21 20:17 | |
The hash, btree and record classes should have an iterator defined.
The current first() and next() functions should make this a fairly
simple change to bsddbmmodule.c. This would allow:
dbh =
dbhash.open('mydb.db', 'r')
for key in dbh:
process(key,
dbh[key])
and eliminate the temptation to use the following,
which would be inadvisable for large databases:
for key in
dbh.keys():
|
|||
| msg53511 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2002-05-09 14:26 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 This is unlikely to happen. More likely, bsddb will be deprecated. |
|||
| msg53512 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2003-06-28 07:11 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=80475 Fixed. |
|||
| msg53513 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2003-06-28 07:55 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 In what way is this fixed? The test program still does not work... |
|||
| msg53514 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2003-06-28 12:02 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=80475 Re-opened. |
|||
| msg55239 - (view) | Author: Gregory P. Smith (gregory.p.smith) * |
Date: 2007-08-24 04:02 | |
this was marked 'open' and 'fixed' at the same time. that should be an invalid state. it was indeed fixed eons ago. |
|||
| msg55241 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2007-08-24 04:42 | |
It had indeed the status Fixed/Open on SF. It was marked as Fixed and Closed by rhettinger, then reopened by rhettinger in response to my comment in msg53513. It does not refer to _bsddb.c, but bsddbmodule.c. Are you saying that bsddbmodule.c supports __iter__? It does not look that way to me... |
|||
| msg55245 - (view) | Author: Gregory P. Smith (gregory.p.smith) * |
Date: 2007-08-24 06:24 | |
Oops. You're right. This was referring to the legacy bsddb185 module in Modules/bsddbmodule.c. In 2.6 that is never built by default. I'm marking it as wont fix. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:05:08 | admin | set | github: 36307 |
| 2007-08-24 06:24:04 | gregory.p.smith | set | resolution: fixed -> wont fix messages: + msg55245 title: bsddb module needs iterators -> bsddb185 module needs iterators |
| 2007-08-24 04:42:02 | loewis | set | messages: + msg55241 |
| 2007-08-24 04:02:05 | gregory.p.smith | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + gregory.p.smith messages: + msg55239 |
| 2002-03-21 20:17:18 | sidlon | create | |