Issue5228
Created on 2009-02-12 14:26 by ndbecker, last changed 2009-03-31 23:48 by jackdied.
|
msg81766 - (view) |
Author: (ndbecker) |
Date: 2009-02-12 14:26 |
|
from multiprocessing import Pool
def power (x, pwr=2):
return x**pwr
import functools
run_test = functools.partial (power, pwr=3)
if __name__ == "__main__":
pool = Pool()
cases = [3,4,5]
results = pool.map (run_test, cases)
TypeError: type 'partial' takes at least one argument
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/multiprocessing-2.6.1.1-py2.5-
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/multiprocessing-2.6.1.1-py2.5-
self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/multiprocessing-2.6.1.1-py2.5-
task = get()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/multiprocessing-2.6.1.1-py2.5-
return recv()
TypeError: type 'partial' takes at least one argument
|
|
msg81767 - (view) |
Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) |
Date: 2009-02-12 14:28 |
|
See this mail thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086034.html
|
|
msg81788 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) |
Date: 2009-02-12 18:01 |
|
Rather than implement a multiprocessing-specific fix, it would certainly
be better to make functools.partial picklable, as pointed out in the ML
thread Jesse linked to.
|
|
msg81789 - (view) |
Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) |
Date: 2009-02-12 18:03 |
|
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> Rather than implement a multiprocessing-specific fix, it would certainly
> be better to make functools.partial picklable, as pointed out in the ML
> thread Jesse linked to.
>
I would tend to agree
|
|
msg84871 - (view) |
Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) |
Date: 2009-03-31 19:13 |
|
I agree that this is a nice feature, however it requires adding a
getstate/setstate within the functools C code.
I would need a patch which does this, and adds tests to the
functools/pickle test suite for this. Also, the feature will only be
accepted for py3k (3.1) currently. Features such as this will not be
backported to the 2.x branch
|
|
msg84872 - (view) |
Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) |
Date: 2009-03-31 19:19 |
|
Jack offered to take a peek
|
|
msg84949 - (view) |
Author: Jack Diederich (jackdied) |
Date: 2009-03-31 23:48 |
|
Fixed rev 70931. Happy pickling!
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009-03-31 23:48:06 | jackdied | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages:
+ msg84949
|
| 2009-03-31 19:19:12 | jnoller | set | assignee: jnoller -> jackdied
messages:
+ msg84872 nosy:
+ jackdied |
| 2009-03-31 19:13:26 | jnoller | set | messages:
+ msg84871 |
| 2009-03-29 14:37:58 | jnoller | set | priority: low |
| 2009-02-12 18:03:27 | jnoller | set | messages:
+ msg81789 |
| 2009-02-12 18:01:51 | pitrou | set | nosy:
+ pitrou messages:
+ msg81788 |
| 2009-02-12 14:28:26 | jnoller | set | messages:
+ msg81767 |
| 2009-02-12 14:27:56 | jnoller | set | assignee: jnoller nosy:
+ christian.heimes |
| 2009-02-12 14:26:28 | ndbecker | create | |
|