➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2009-01-09 14:52 by garcia, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg79472 - (view) | Author: garcia (garcia) | Date: 2009-01-09 14:52 | |
The documentation for PyIter_Next says it will raise TypeError if the object passed to it is not an iterator. However, the implementation in abstract.c performs an assert rather than raising TypeError. I would prefer if the implementation were adjusted to match the documentation rather than vice-versa. |
|||
| msg79481 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2009-01-09 17:38 | |
Closing a duplicate of #3720. |
|||
| msg79488 - (view) | Author: garcia (garcia) | Date: 2009-01-09 18:59 | |
Thanks for the quick response. I see that the discussion in 3720 implicitly involves the implementation of PyIter_Next, but the documentation for PyIter_Next (and its conflict with the implementation) is not mentioned. |
|||
| msg79489 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) * |
Date: 2009-01-09 19:00 | |
The reason I linked to that issue is that the proposed patch brings the implementation inline with the documentation as you wished. :) |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:43 | admin | set | github: 49147 |
| 2009-01-09 19:00:57 | benjamin.peterson | set | messages: + msg79489 |
| 2009-01-09 18:59:39 | garcia | set | messages: + msg79488 |
| 2009-01-09 17:38:08 | benjamin.peterson | set | status: open -> closed resolution: duplicate superseder: segfault in for loop with evil iterator messages: + msg79481 nosy: + benjamin.peterson |
| 2009-01-09 14:52:15 | garcia | create | |