➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2008-08-29 23:46 by tarek, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg72174 - (view) | Author: Tarek Ziadé (tarek) *  |
Date: 2008-08-29 23:46 | |
super is defined as a built-in function http://docs.python.org/dev/library/functions.html but it is a type, shouldn't it be replaced ? |
|||
| msg72178 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2008-08-30 00:09 | |
Am already working on the docs for super(). |
|||
| msg74153 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2008-10-02 02:38 | |
The super() docs have been updated to be more clear. It is still listed amongst built-in functions -- that list doesn't separate callables that are also types, so super() is appropriately listed side-by-side with tuple(). |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:38 | admin | set | github: 47986 |
| 2008-10-02 02:38:06 | rhettinger | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages: + msg74153 |
| 2008-08-30 00:09:16 | rhettinger | set | assignee: georg.brandl -> rhettinger messages: + msg72178 nosy: + rhettinger |
| 2008-08-29 23:46:29 | tarek | create | |