➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2017-06-28 00:10 by vstinner, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 2555 | merged | serhiy.storchaka, 2017-07-04 04:00 | |
| Messages (7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg297077 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) *  |
Date: 2017-06-28 00:10 | |
Currently, _PyCode_SetExtra() uses two memory block for code extras. Using a different structure, it would be possible to use a single memory block: less memory fragmentation, better CPU cache usage, less indirections, etc. It matters since the long term plan for co_extras is to implement of kind-of JIT compiler insider CPython: see bpo-28158. |
|||
| msg297624 - (view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * |
Date: 2017-07-04 04:01 | |
Since nobody has provided a patch I have made it myself. |
|||
| msg297648 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * |
Date: 2017-07-04 12:06 | |
New changeset 378ebb6578b9d709f38b888d23874c0b18125249 by Victor Stinner (Serhiy Storchaka) in branch 'master': bpo-30789: Use a single memory block for co_extra. (#2555) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/378ebb6578b9d709f38b888d23874c0b18125249 |
|||
| msg297745 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * |
Date: 2017-07-05 13:44 | |
New changeset 8207c17486baece8ed0ac42d9f8d69ecec4ba7e4 by Victor Stinner in branch 'master': Revert "bpo-30822: Fix testing of datetime module." (#2588) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/8207c17486baece8ed0ac42d9f8d69ecec4ba7e4 |
|||
| msg297764 - (view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * |
Date: 2017-07-05 15:01 | |
How is this related to datetime module? I hope you didn't reverted too much? |
|||
| msg297769 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * |
Date: 2017-07-05 15:59 | |
> How is this related to datetime module? I hope you didn't reverted too much? I'm sorry for the spam. It was the first time that I really used the [Revert] button: even if the revert change is correct, the *commit message* is completely wrong :-/ https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2017-July/004674.html |
|||
| msg297770 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * |
Date: 2017-07-05 15:59 | |
I'm sorry for the spam. It was the first time that I really used the [Revert] button: even if the revert change is correct, the *commit message* is completely wrong :-/ https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2017-July/004674.html |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:48 | admin | set | github: 74972 |
| 2017-07-05 15:59:12 | vstinner | set | messages: + msg297770 |
| 2017-07-05 15:59:10 | vstinner | set | messages: + msg297769 |
| 2017-07-05 15:01:24 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messages: + msg297764 |
| 2017-07-05 13:44:56 | vstinner | set | messages: + msg297745 |
| 2017-07-04 12:18:48 | serhiy.storchaka | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2017-07-04 12:06:18 | vstinner | set | messages: + msg297648 |
| 2017-07-04 04:01:06 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messages:
+ msg297624 stage: needs patch -> patch review |
| 2017-07-04 04:00:00 | serhiy.storchaka | set | pull_requests: + pull_request2624 |
| 2017-06-28 04:08:47 | serhiy.storchaka | set | nosy:
+ serhiy.storchaka stage: needs patch |
| 2017-06-28 00:11:55 | vstinner | set | nosy:
+ dino.viehland, yselivanov |
| 2017-06-28 00:10:41 | vstinner | create | |