Section 5.4: Numeric Types

Second paragraph reads: 
Appending 'j' or 'J' to a numeric literal yields a complex number with a zero real part.

After reading the table following the paragraphs I thought that the sentence needed revised to the following:
Appending 'j' or 'J' to a numeric literal yields a complex number with a zero imaginary part.

Table in same section for complex(re, im) indicates possible required doc change.

But after testing the use of J and complex I see there is no error here, but perhaps a little better clarification would help others reading the information without access to an editor to test against.

For anyone who wants to work on this: this is 5.4 of the python2.7 docs.  The wording in the python3 docs (https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#numeric-types-int-float-complex) is much clearer, if someone wants to prepare a backport patch.

Hi, here is the doc update, to be applied to 2.7 branch.

Please review. Thanks :)

I don't like the term 'imaginary number' but the usage is standard, and python does not have 'complex literals' (I checked 2.7 chapter 2 on number literals).  So I will apply this.

New changeset f8d12cb7d0fd by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '2.7':
Issue #28615: Backport imaginary/complex number text from 3.x.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f8d12cb7d0fd