➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2016-09-11 00:27 by michael0x2a, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| update-none-vs-type-none.patch | michael0x2a, 2016-09-11 00:27 | |||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg275718 - (view) | Author: Michael Lee (michael0x2a) * | Date: 2016-09-11 00:27 | |
For some reason, the section of the typing docs about Optional stated that Optional[T] was equivalent to Union[T, type(None)]. While this is true, it's somewhat inconsistent and potentially confusing since everywhere else in the docs, we just use None. This patch modifies that line to use Union[T, type(None)] instead, and moves the line explaining that None is special-cased to mean type(None) to the first usage of None as a type within the docs. |
|||
| msg275720 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev)  |
Date: 2016-09-11 01:49 | |
New changeset 75514816741a by Guido van Rossum in branch '3.5': Issue #28073: Improve wording around None. Michael Lee. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/75514816741a New changeset 7a4a16a880a4 by Guido van Rossum in branch 'default': Issue #28073: Improve wording around None. Michael Lee. (3.5->3.6) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7a4a16a880a4 |
|||
| msg275721 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) *  |
Date: 2016-09-11 01:50 | |
Thanks! Busy Saturday night, right? :-) |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:36 | admin | set | github: 72260 |
| 2016-09-11 01:50:17 | gvanrossum | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages: + msg275721 |
| 2016-09-11 01:49:44 | python-dev | set | nosy:
+ python-dev messages: + msg275720 |
| 2016-09-11 00:27:08 | michael0x2a | create | |