➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2016-02-19 19:32 by palaviv, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| random-shuffled.patch | palaviv, 2016-02-19 19:32 | review | ||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg260529 - (view) | Author: Aviv Palivoda (palaviv) * | Date: 2016-02-19 19:32 | |
I am suggesting adding random.shuffled to the random module. This is very similar to the shuffle function just return a new shuffled list instead of in place shuffle. This is very similar to the sorted and list.sort. As you can see in the patch the shuffled function just return random.sample(x, len(x)) as this is what i usually do when i want to get back a shuffled list. |
|||
| msg260934 - (view) | Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) *  |
Date: 2016-02-27 09:25 | |
It is against our policy to wrap random half-line expressions as new function. Doing so would bloat Python until it became unusable. This should be rejected. |
|||
| msg260944 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2016-02-27 19:56 | |
I concur with Terry. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:27 | admin | set | github: 70581 |
| 2020-08-02 10:50:09 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue41457 superseder |
| 2016-02-27 19:56:07 | rhettinger | set | status: open -> closed assignee: rhettinger resolution: rejected messages: + msg260944 |
| 2016-02-27 09:25:59 | terry.reedy | set | nosy:
+ terry.reedy messages: + msg260934 |
| 2016-02-19 19:32:21 | palaviv | create | |