Created on 2008-03-17 17:49 by brett.cannon, last changed 2008-07-31 01:53 by benjamin.peterson. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg63694 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) *  |
Date: 2008-03-17 17:49 | |
PEP 3114 needs to be backported. Most likely the best approach is to backport the next() built-in but to have it call next() on the iterator instead of __next__(). That should hopefully minimize breakage while allowing for moving over to the new built-in. |
|||
| msg63701 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2008-03-17 18:12 | |
I don't think this should be backported. It leaves Py2.6 with a confused mess of protocols. The 2-to-3 transformation is simple. Backporting doesn't add value. |
|||
| msg70456 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) * |
Date: 2008-07-31 01:53 | |
This has been done. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-07-31 01:53:08 | benjamin.peterson | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + benjamin.peterson resolution: duplicate messages: + msg70456 |
| 2008-03-17 20:11:37 | brett.cannon | set | priority: release blocker -> critical |
| 2008-03-17 18:12:20 | rhettinger | set | nosy:
+ rhettinger messages: + msg63701 |
| 2008-03-17 17:49:20 | brett.cannon | create | |