This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: Add xturtle to the standard library?
Type: enhancement Stage:
Components: Versions: Python 3.0, Python 2.6
process
Status: closed Resolution: duplicate
Dependencies: Superseder: new turtle module
View: 1513695
Assigned To: Nosy List: georg.brandl, gregorlingl, gvanrossum, loewis
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2008-03-16 21:22 by gvanrossum, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (4)
msg63595 - (view) Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * (Python committer) Date: 2008-03-16 21:22
Georg Lingl has offered his xturtle for the standard library.  Barring
showstopping problems with dependencies or code qualitiy I think this is
a good thing to add to 3.0 as a replacement for turtle, and to add to
2.6 while keeping the old turtle module.
msg63596 - (view) Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * (Python committer) Date: 2008-03-16 21:23
See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/077621.html
msg63603 - (view) Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) Date: 2008-03-16 21:48
See also issue1513695.

I don't see a principle problem replacing turtle with xturtle, assuming 
its compatible.
msg63719 - (view) Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) Date: 2008-03-17 19:24
Closing in favor of #1513695.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:56:31adminsetgithub: 46562
2008-03-17 19:24:37georg.brandlsetstatus: open -> closed
resolution: duplicate
2008-03-17 19:24:23georg.brandlsetnosy: + georg.brandl
superseder: new turtle module
messages: + msg63719
2008-03-16 21:49:04loewissetnosy: + gregorlingl
2008-03-16 21:48:24loewissetnosy: + loewis
messages: + msg63603
2008-03-16 21:23:45gvanrossumsetmessages: + msg63596
2008-03-16 21:22:44gvanrossumcreate