In https://bitbucket.org/jaraco/backports.functools_lru_cache/issue/1/python-2-attributeerror-int-object-has-no, a user was confused when he tried to use the lrucache decorator incorrectly, passing the wrapped function directly to lrucache. Consider:

    @lrucache
    def expensive(param):
        pass

One can even get away with profiling that now decorated function:

    for x in range(10000):
        expensive(x)

The test will run without error, but it's not doing what the user thinks it's doing. In the first section, it's creating a decorator, and in the second section, it's wrapping an int in that decorator, but because the wrapper is never called, an error is never raised.

I propose adding a simple check that if maxsize is callable, raise a TypeError. That would prevent unintentional misuse and subtle non-failure with minimal impact on performance.

New changeset 780693490c84 by Raymond Hettinger in branch '3.4':
Issue 22184: Early detection and reporting of missing lru_cache parameters
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/780693490c84

Awesome. Thanks for the quick implementation.

> Awesome. Thanks for the quick implementation.

Happy to do it.  Thanks for the clean bug report.