➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2013-09-05 10:58 by giampaolo.rodola, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| devpoll.patch | giampaolo.rodola, 2013-09-05 17:57 | review | ||
| devpoll2.patch | giampaolo.rodola, 2014-03-18 19:27 | |||
| devpoll3.patch | giampaolo.rodola, 2014-03-19 18:12 | |||
| devpoll3_try_again.diff | neologix, 2014-03-20 19:29 | review | ||
| Messages (19) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg196989 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) *  |
Date: 2013-09-05 10:58 | |
This is a follow up of issue 16853. I will try to see whether I can come up with a patch later today. |
|||
| msg197015 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) * |
Date: 2013-09-05 17:57 | |
Patch is in attachment. |
|||
| msg200756 - (view) | Author: Charles-François Natali (neologix) * |
Date: 2013-10-21 12:03 | |
Just to let you know that I'm not forgetting this issue. I'd just like to iron-out issue #19172 (keys()-like method for selectors), since it could impact the API, to avoid repeated refactoring. |
|||
| msg202118 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * |
Date: 2013-11-04 11:04 | |
@Giampaolo: Your patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore. Could you update it? Issue #19172 has been fixed, selectors now have a get_map() method. |
|||
| msg213886 - (view) | Author: Jesús Cea Avión (jcea) * |
Date: 2014-03-17 19:46 | |
We missed 3.4 :-(. Targeting Python 3.5 now. Giampaolo, could you possibly refresh your patch?. Thanks. |
|||
| msg213898 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) * |
Date: 2014-03-17 21:17 | |
Sorry for not being able to rewrite the patch in time for 3.4. I will provide an updated patch (I need to setup an Open Solaris box first though). The code for poll(), epoll() and /dev/poll will have many similarities, so I think it makes sense to refactor it and use a base class to avoid code duplication, similarly to what I did in my original patch. |
|||
| msg213900 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * |
Date: 2014-03-17 21:21 | |
I actually prefer some code duplication in this case. Makes the review easier. On Mar 17, 2014 2:17 PM, "Giampaolo Rodola'" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: > > Sorry for not being able to rewrite the patch in time for 3.4. > I will provide an updated patch (I need to setup an Open Solaris box first > though). > The code for poll(), epoll() and /dev/poll will have many similarities, so > I think it makes sense to refactor it and use a base class to avoid code > duplication, similarly to what I did in my original patch. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue18931> > _______________________________________ > |
|||
| msg213901 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) * |
Date: 2014-03-17 21:24 | |
OK, I will provide a patch soon. |
|||
| msg213909 - (view) | Author: Jesús Cea Avión (jcea) * |
Date: 2014-03-17 22:54 | |
BDFL talked :-). I can test the patch on a Solaris box, and Python has OpenSolaris buildbots. |
|||
| msg214008 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) * |
Date: 2014-03-18 19:27 | |
Patch in attachment. |
|||
| msg214016 - (view) | Author: Charles-François Natali (neologix) * |
Date: 2014-03-18 20:51 | |
Could you regenerate it without --git (it doesn't show under the review tool)? |
|||
| msg214023 - (view) | Author: Yury Selivanov (yselivanov) * |
Date: 2014-03-18 21:37 | |
Why there is no 'review' link for the new patch? |
|||
| msg214027 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * |
Date: 2014-03-18 21:40 | |
review links are only generated for patches that apply cleanly (I don't know to which branch) On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Yury Selivanov <report@bugs.python.org>wrote: > > Yury Selivanov added the comment: > > Why there is no 'review' link for the new patch? > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue18931> > _______________________________________ > |
|||
| msg214118 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) * |
Date: 2014-03-19 18:12 | |
Regenerated without --git. |
|||
| msg214137 - (view) | Author: Yury Selivanov (yselivanov) * |
Date: 2014-03-19 21:12 | |
Still no review link. Somehow you managed to upload the first patch correctly. Does the new one apply cleanly on the default branch? |
|||
| msg214207 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) * |
Date: 2014-03-20 11:43 | |
"hg import http://bugs.python.org/file34522/devpoll3.patch" applies cleanly for me. Not sure what else to do. |
|||
| msg214275 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * |
Date: 2014-03-20 20:35 | |
LGTM, but I don't have a Solaris box to test. I suppose one of you has tested this? Then okay to commit to the default (== 3.5) branch. |
|||
| msg214280 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev)  |
Date: 2014-03-20 20:54 | |
New changeset 0a51a516bc70 by Giampaolo Rodola' in branch 'default': Fix issue 18931: selectors module now supports /dev/poll on Solaris. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/0a51a516bc70 |
|||
| msg214282 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) * |
Date: 2014-03-20 20:57 | |
I successfully tested this on Solaris 11. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:50 | admin | set | github: 63131 |
| 2014-03-20 20:57:23 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messages: + msg214282 |
| 2014-03-20 20:55:40 | giampaolo.rodola | set | status: open -> closed assignee: giampaolo.rodola resolution: fixed components: + Library (Lib) |
| 2014-03-20 20:54:40 | python-dev | set | messages: + msg214280 |
| 2014-03-20 20:35:30 | gvanrossum | set | messages: + msg214275 |
| 2014-03-20 19:29:10 | neologix | set | files: + devpoll3_try_again.diff |
| 2014-03-20 11:43:36 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messages: + msg214207 |
| 2014-03-19 21:12:03 | yselivanov | set | messages: + msg214137 |
| 2014-03-19 18:12:36 | giampaolo.rodola | set | files:
+ devpoll3.patch messages: + msg214118 |
| 2014-03-18 21:40:10 | gvanrossum | set | messages: + msg214027 |
| 2014-03-18 21:37:05 | yselivanov | set | messages: + msg214023 |
| 2014-03-18 20:51:09 | neologix | set | messages: + msg214016 |
| 2014-03-18 19:27:01 | giampaolo.rodola | set | files:
+ devpoll2.patch messages: + msg214008 |
| 2014-03-17 22:54:43 | jcea | set | messages: + msg213909 |
| 2014-03-17 21:24:53 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messages: + msg213901 |
| 2014-03-17 21:21:51 | gvanrossum | set | messages: + msg213900 |
| 2014-03-17 21:17:39 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messages: + msg213898 |
| 2014-03-17 19:46:12 | jcea | set | messages:
+ msg213886 versions: + Python 3.5, - Python 3.4 |
| 2014-03-15 15:04:25 | yselivanov | set | nosy:
+ yselivanov |
| 2013-11-04 11:04:55 | vstinner | set | messages: + msg202118 |
| 2013-10-21 12:03:32 | neologix | set | messages: + msg200756 |
| 2013-09-06 00:02:30 | jcea | set | nosy:
+ jcea |
| 2013-09-05 17:57:15 | giampaolo.rodola | set | files:
+ devpoll.patch keywords: + patch messages: + msg197015 |
| 2013-09-05 10:58:35 | giampaolo.rodola | create | |