➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2013-02-20 23:34 by MrDrMcNinja, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| OrderedDictBug.png | MrDrMcNinja, 2013-02-20 23:34 | |||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg182570 - (view) | Author: Mrdrmcninja (MrDrMcNinja) | Date: 2013-02-20 23:34 | |
I've got two lists:
state_cns_list = [0.001, 1, 2, 5]
state_names_list = [L, S, D, H]
When I try to create an OrderedDict linking each state_cns_list entry with its corresponding state_names_list entry, like so:
states = OrderedDict( {float(state_cns_list[i]): state_names_list[i] for i in range(0, len(state_cns_list) ) } )
rather than maintaining the original order, (0.001, 'L') is placed at the end of the OrderedDict instead of at the beginning. The attached screenshot shows the bug in action.
Although it's not in the screenshot, when I try placing 4 integers into state_cns_list instead of 3 integers and a float, it has no problem correctly ordering them.
|
|||
| msg182571 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2013-02-20 23:35 | |
The dictionary you pass to the OrderedDict constructor has already lost the order you initialize it with. |
|||
| msg182572 - (view) | Author: Mrdrmcninja (MrDrMcNinja) | Date: 2013-02-20 23:36 | |
Ahh nevermind, just realized my error :P Sorry for the waste of internet space |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:42 | admin | set | github: 61464 |
| 2013-02-21 06:58:02 | ezio.melotti | set | stage: resolved |
| 2013-02-20 23:36:30 | MrDrMcNinja | set | messages: + msg182572 |
| 2013-02-20 23:35:53 | benjamin.peterson | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + benjamin.peterson messages: + msg182571 resolution: not a bug |
| 2013-02-20 23:34:31 | MrDrMcNinja | create | |