Issue1596
Created on 2007-12-11 22:02 by alexandre.vassalotti, last changed 2009-10-24 16:19 by naufraghi.
|
msg58469 - (view) |
Author: Alexandre Vassalotti (alexandre.vassalotti) |
Date: 2007-12-11 22:02 |
|
I think Python 2.x should mimic, or improve on, the behavior of Py3k for
handling broken pipes. That is:
1. Don't print the message "close failed: [Errno 32] Broken pipe",
from filemodule.c; since this is impossible to override from Python.
2. Check sys.stdout if it's closed before calling the print routine.
Raise an IOError if so.
Finally, here's some examples to illustrate what I am saying:
alex:~% python -c "print" | head -n0
close failed: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
alex:~% python -c "while 1: print" | head -n0
[The loop continues running, even if the output stream is closed]
^C
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
KeyboardInterrupt
close failed: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
alex:~% py3k -c "print()" | head -n0
alex:~% py3k -c "while 1: print()" | head -n0
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
IOError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
|
|
msg58470 - (view) |
Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) |
Date: 2007-12-11 22:06 |
|
I'll entertain a patch for 2.6.
For 2.5 I think this smells too much like a feature.
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009-10-24 16:19:20 | naufraghi | set | nosy:
+ naufraghi
|
| 2008-03-18 00:36:41 | jafo | set | priority: normal |
| 2007-12-11 22:06:29 | gvanrossum | set | nosy:
+ gvanrossum messages:
+ msg58470 |
| 2007-12-11 22:02:26 | alexandre.vassalotti | create | |
|