Everything's in the title. __loader__ probably needs to be blacklisted.

Attached patch does the trick.  (Also removes extra whitespace in three lines and groups the ignored names by topic for ease of reading.)

No test fails before or after the patch; there are some pydoc tests that check full text or HTML output, but apparently none that triggers the appearance of of __loader__ in the module data section.  If someone thinks such a test is needed, please complete my patch, otherwise I can commit it.

Looks good to me.

I have internet problems at home and am not set up to work on Python at work, so feel free to commit the patch.

Can you still not commit this patch, Eric?

Now I have hardware issues, so no.

Georg, is it okay if I commit this on Eric's behalf for 3.3?

Great to review such patches, where I have to take out a notepad and write the names down to check a 1-item addition.</grumble>

But it seems it does what's on the label, so go ahead.

I will alphabetize as part of the patch (I had the same issue myself of verifying the change).

Sorry for the annoyance.  I changed the order (and did not choose to alphabetize) because I thought it was easier to read with names grouped by topic, as I said in an earlier message, but please do as you think best.

New changeset 6a27b9f37b05 by Brett Cannon in branch 'default':
Issue #15163: Pydoc shouldn't show __loader__ as a part of a module's
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6a27b9f37b05

Don't worry about it, Eric. while the idea of grouping by concept is laudable, when the list is that long it's best to just alphabetize to make diffs easier to read.