The `repr()` built-in function link  in this page [ http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html ] should link to the built-in version of `repr()`.
It should link to: http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html#repr

However, it links to here: http://docs.python.org/library/repr.html#module-repr

This is only a problem in the 2.7 docs.

I tried adding a .. py:currentmodule:: builtins directive to the page, hoping that would make all unqualified links local, but it didn't work.  I think the fix will require someone with more Sphinx-foo than I have.

Shows how it's a bad thing to have a builtin function and a module of the same name :)

New changeset 4416efeb0163 by Georg Brandl in branch '2.7':
Closes #14489: correct link target.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4416efeb0163

As of today the link is still not fixed although I guess it should have been due to the patch mentioned in http://bugs.python.org/issue14489#msg157543

I think this has been fixed. Where did you see the incorrect link?

The wrong link is still at http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html

Confirm that this is not fixed.

New changeset aea3167355fc by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7':
#14489: fix wrong link.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/aea3167355fc

The s/:func:`repr`/:func:`.repr`/ committed by Georg got lost in 07b3fc67bf45, however reintroducing it results in this warning:
"Doc/library/functions.rst:1182: WARNING: duplicate object description of repr, other instance in Doc/library/repr.rst, use :noindex: for one of them"
Even after adding the :noindex: the repr() in the table wasn't a link, so I ended up using a workaround that fixed the link and didn't need the :noindex:.