There are several bugs on 

http://docs.python.org/library/datetime.html

Section 8.1.6 references the method rzinfo.dst(), which does not exist. Presumably this should be tzinfo.dst().

Section 8.1.4 contains an implementation of a GMT2 timezone. There seems to be a bug in the utcoffset() and dst() implementations. The timedelta(hours=2) is in the dst() implementation, but it should be in the uctoffset() implementation. 

The docs for tzinfo.utcoffset() start with 'Return offset of local time from UTC, in minutes east of UTC'. Other methods (eg dst()) also document that the unit to return should be 'minutes'. However, all code samples instead return a timedelta. The documentation I quoted should instead read 'Return offset of local time from UTC as a timedelta, or None'.

2.6 only gets security updates.

I verified 'rzinfo' typo in x.1.6 in 2.7 and 3.2. Also in both, tzinfo.utcoffset begins as Stephen claims. I have not verified that this is error.

 Also in both, in x.1.4, class GMT1 has
...     def utcoffset(self, dt):
...         return timedelta(hours=1) + self.dst(dt)
...     def dst(self, dt):
...         if self.dston <=  dt.replace(tzinfo=None) < self.dstoff:
...             return timedelta(hours=1)
...         else:
...             return timedelta(0)

while GMT2 has
...     def utcoffset(self, dt):
...         return timedelta(hours=1) + self.dst(dt)
...     def dst(self, dt):
...         if self.dston <=  dt.replace(tzinfo=None) < self.dstoff:
...             return timedelta(hours=2)
...         else:
...             return timedelta(0)

Stephen is saying that 'hours=1' should here be 'hours=2'. Should '0' by 'hours=1' to be just 1 off from 2?

This patch fixes the rzinfo typo as well as the GMT2 issue (GMT +2 should behave exactly the same as GMT +1 with regards to DST, it's base offset should simply be +2 hours instead of +1).

This does not; however, address the comment about the first line of the tzinfo.utcoffset(). The fact that tzinfo.utcoffset() should return a timedelta or None is addressed later in the same paragraph, as such I'm not sure the proposed change is an improvement.

Looks like the issue of the first line of utcoffsect was also raised in issue 8810.

Patch looks good to me.

There are actually other bugs in the same code example:

...     def __init__(self):         # DST starts last Sunday in March
...         d = datetime(dt.year, 4, 1)   # ends last Sunday in October
...         self.dston = d - timedelta(days=d.weekday() + 1)
...         d = datetime(dt.year, 11, 1)
...         self.dstoff = d - timedelta(days=d.weekday() + 1)

where does dt come from? this fragment should be in the implementation of dst (in both the GMT1 and GMT2 classes.