➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2011-10-26 21:15 by flox, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| all_classes_belong_to_new_style.diff | flox, 2011-10-26 21:15 | review | ||
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg146455 - (view) | Author: Florent Xicluna (flox) *  |
Date: 2011-10-26 21:15 | |
these last references to old/new classes should be dropped. See patch. |
|||
| msg146497 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2011-10-27 15:47 | |
LGTM. |
|||
| msg146532 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2011-10-28 03:11 | |
Removed the newstyle/oldstyle comments is fine. I don't see the reason for the type->class change though. |
|||
| msg146542 - (view) | Author: Florent Xicluna (flox) * |
Date: 2011-10-28 08:57 | |
the type>class change reflects the current output on 3.x |
|||
| msg146544 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev)  |
Date: 2011-10-28 09:24 | |
New changeset 54abca0ab03b by Florent Xicluna in branch '3.2': Fixes #13270: obsolete reference to old-style/new-style classes. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/54abca0ab03b |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:23 | admin | set | github: 57479 |
| 2011-10-28 12:23:17 | flox | set | status: open -> closed |
| 2011-10-28 09:27:34 | flox | set | resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2011-10-28 09:24:03 | python-dev | set | nosy:
+ python-dev messages: + msg146544 |
| 2011-10-28 08:57:01 | flox | set | messages: + msg146542 |
| 2011-10-28 03:11:20 | rhettinger | set | nosy:
+ rhettinger messages: + msg146532 |
| 2011-10-27 15:47:56 | eric.araujo | set | nosy:
+ eric.araujo messages: + msg146497 |
| 2011-10-26 21:15:49 | flox | create | |