Issue1142
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2007-09-10 15:52 by Richard.Christen@unice.fr, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Files | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
christen.vcf | Richard.Christen@unice.fr, 2007-09-11 06:18 | |||
christen.vcf | Richard.Christen@unice.fr, 2007-09-12 06:10 |
Messages (11) | |||
---|---|---|---|
msg55785 - (view) | Author: christen (Richard.Christen@unice.fr) | Date: 2007-09-10 15:52 | |
Error in reading >4Go files under windows try this: import sys print(sys.version_info) import time print (time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')) liste=[] start = time.time() fichout=open('test.txt','w') for i in xrange(85014961): if i%5000000==0 and i>0: print (i,time.time()-start) fichout.write(str(i)+' '*59+'\n') fichout.close() print ('total lines written ',i) print (i,time.time()-start) print ('*'*50) fichin=open('test.txt') start3 = time.time() for i,li in enumerate(fichin): if i%5000000==0 and i>0: print (i,time.time()-start3) fichin.close() print ('total lines read ',i) print(time.time()-start) it generates a >4Go file,not all lines are read !! example: ('total lines written ', 85014960) ('total lines read ', 85014950) 10 lines are missing if you replace by fichout.write(str(i)+' '*59+'\n') file is now under 4Go, is properly read Used both a 32 and 64 Windows XP machines seems to work with Linux and BSD (did not tried this example but had no pb with my home made big files) Pb : many examples of >4Go files for the human genome and other biological applications. Almost sure that people are doing mistakes, because it took me a while before discovering that... Note : does not happen with py 3k :-) |
|||
msg55786 - (view) | Author: christen (Richard.Christen@unice.fr) | Date: 2007-09-10 15:54 | |
made an error in copy paste if you replace by fichout.write(str(i)+' '*59+'\n') should be if you replace by fichout.write(str(i)+'\n') of course :-( |
|||
msg55794 - (view) | Author: Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens (pythonmeister) | Date: 2007-09-10 21:03 | |
Error confirmed for this python: Python 3.0a1 (py3k, Sep 10 2007, 22:45:51) [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2 See this: stefan@nx6310:~$ python2.4 large_io.py (2, 4, 4, 'final', 0) 2007-09-10 21:41:52 (5000000, 14.321661949157715) (10000000, 30.311280965805054) (15000000, 45.24985408782959) (20000000, 59.537726879119873) (25000000, 74.075110912322998) (30000000, 87.76087498664856) (35000000, 104.54858303070068) (40000000, 121.84645009040833) (45000000, 137.88236308097839) (50000000, 155.42996501922607) (55000000, 171.81011009216309) (60000000, 188.44834208488464) (65000000, 204.46978211402893) (70000000, 218.81346702575684) (75000000, 232.86778998374939) (80000000, 246.6789391040802) (85000000, 260.89796900749207) ('total lines written ', 85014960) (85014960, 260.94281101226807) ************************************************** (5000000, 14.598887920379639) (10000000, 29.428265810012817) (15000000, 44.457981824874878) (20000000, 60.351485967636108) (25000000, 79.3228759765625) (30000000, 94.667810916900635) (35000000, 110.35149884223938) (40000000, 126.19746398925781) (45000000, 141.83787989616394) (50000000, 157.46236801147461) (55000000, 173.10227298736572) (60000000, 188.19510197639465) (65000000, 197.369295835495) (70000000, 206.41998481750488) (75000000, 215.53365993499756) (80000000, 224.55904102325439) (85000000, 233.75891900062561) ('total lines read ', 85014960) 494.727725029 stefan@nx6310:~$ python3.0 large_io.py (3, 0, 0, 'alpha', 1) 2007-09-10 21:50:53 5000000 194.725461006 Tasks: 144 total, 3 running, 141 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 50.2%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 48.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 1026804k total, 846416k used, 180388k free, 7952k buffers Swap: 1028152k total, 66576k used, 961576k free, 679032k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 28778 stefan 25 0 7800 3552 1596 R 100 0.3 6:01.48 python3.0 |
|||
msg55801 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * | Date: 2007-09-10 21:55 | |
PythonMeister, what do you mean, "confirmed"? Your read loop ends printing ('total lines read ', 85014960) which is the expected output. (It's one less than the number of lines written due to a bug in the program -- it prints the 0-based ordinal of the last line written rather than the total number of lines written, which is one more. But the bug is the same in the input and output loop. Richard's output from the read loop was ('total lines read ', 85014950) i.e. 10 less than written. I wonder if the bug is simply a matter of a failure to flush on Windows? I can't reproduce it on Linux (Ubuntu dapper). Richard, can you somehow view the end of the file to see what its last lines actually are? It should end like this: 85014951 85014952 85014953 85014954 85014955 85014956 85014957 85014958 85014959 85014960 |
|||
msg55810 - (view) | Author: Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens (pythonmeister) | Date: 2007-09-11 05:29 | |
I can confirm that under Linux (Linux nx6310 2.6.22-1-mepis-smp #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 5 22:23:08 EDT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux, SimplyMepis 7.0b3) 1. using Python 3.0a1 is _very_ slow 2. it eats all your cpu (see my post) I did not take the time to wait for the program to finish with 3.0a1, as my patience is limited. I don't think it would silently drop lines, as the windows version. To see if flushing matters, I'll try this later: import sys print(sys.version_info) import time print (time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')) liste=[] start = time.time() fichout=open('test.txt','w') for i in xrange(85014961): if i%5000000==0 and i>0: print (i,time.time()-start) fichout.write(str(i)+' '*59+'\n') fishout.flush() fichout.close() print ('total lines written ',i) print (i,time.time()-start) print ('*'*50) fichin=open('test.txt') start3 = time.time() for i,li in enumerate(fichin): if i%5000000==0 and i>0: print (i,time.time()-start3) fichin.close() print ('total lines read ',i) print(time.time()-start) I've seen a case lately on Windows XP SP2 with Python 2.3, where a college of mine wrote some files he read from a zip file to disk. Before the close() he also had to flush() the written files explicitly, otherwise he was not able to rename them afterwards. His first approach was time.sleep(30), which was not an option. I'll come back, if I ran the code under Windows. |
|||
msg55813 - (view) | Author: christen (Richard.Christen@unice.fr) | Date: 2007-09-11 06:18 | |
Hi Guido It is not the end of the file that is not read (see also below) I found about that about one year ago when I was parsing very large files resulting from "blast" on the human genome My parser chock after 4 Go, well before the end of the file : one line was missing and my acc=li[x:y] end up with an error, because acc was never filled... This was kind of strange because this had not happened before with my Linux box. I opened the file (which I had created myself) with a editor that could show hexa code : the proper line was there and allright. If I remember well, I modified my code to see better what was going on : in fact the missing line had been concateneted to the previous line despite the proper existence of the end of line (hexa code was ok). see also below I forgot about that because nobody replied to my mails, and I thought it was possibly related with windows 32 . I moved to a windows 64 recently (windows has the best driver for SQL databases) and forgot about the bug until I again ran into it. I then decided to try python 3k, it reads >4Go file with no trouble but is so so slow, both in reading and writing files. The following code produces either <4Go or >4Go files depending upon which fichout.write is commented They both have the same line numbers, but the >4Go does not read completely under windows (32 or 64) I have no such pb on Linux or BSD (Mac). python 3k on windows read both files ok, but is very very slow (change xrange to range , I guess it is preposterous to advice you about that :-). best Richard import sys print(sys.version_info) import time print (time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')) liste=[] start = time.time() fichout=open('test.txt','w') for i in xrange(85014961): if i%5000000==0 and i>0: print (i,time.time()-start) fichout.write(str(i)+' '*59+'\n') #big file #fichout.write(str(i)+'\n') #small file, same number of lines fishout.flush() fichout.close() print ('total lines written ',i) print (i,time.time()-start) print ('*'*50) fichin=open('test.txt') start3 = time.time() for i,li in enumerate(fichin): if i%5000000==0 and i>0: print (i,time.time()-start3) fichin.close() print ('total lines read ',i) print(time.time()-start) > Richard, can you somehow view the end of the file to see what its last > lines actually are? It should end like this: > > 85014951 > 85014952 > 85014953 > 85014954 > 85014955 > 85014956 > 85014957 > 85014958 > 85014959 > 85014960 > > using a text editor reads: 85014944 85014945 85014946 85014947 85014948 85014949 85014950 85014951 85014952 85014953 85014954 85014955 85014956 85014957 85014958 85014959 85014960 windows py 2.5, with if i>85014940: print i, li.strip() prints : (2, 5, 0, 'final', 0) 2007-09-11 07:58:47 (5000000, 2.6720001697540283) (10000000, 5.375) (15000000, 8.0320000648498535) (20000000, 10.703000068664551) (25000000, 13.375) (30000000, 16.047000169754028) (35000000, 18.703000068664551) (40000000, 21.360000133514404) (45000000, 24.032000064849854) (50000000, 26.687999963760376) (55000000, 29.360000133514404) (60000000, 32.032000064849854) (65000000, 34.703000068664551) (70000000, 37.407000064849854) (75000000, 40.094000101089478) (80000000, 42.797000169754028) (85000000, 45.485000133514404) 85014941 85014951 85014942 85014952 85014943 85014953 85014944 85014954 85014945 85014955 85014946 85014956 85014947 85014957 85014948 85014958 85014949 85014959 85014950 85014960 ==> missing lines are from within the file now introduce in the loop: if len(li)>80: print li.strip() (2, 5, 0, 'final', 0) 2007-09-11 08:08:16 (5000000, 3.1559998989105225) (10000000, 6.3280000686645508) (15000000, 9.4839999675750732) (20000000, 12.655999898910522) (25000000, 15.843999862670898) (30000000, 19.016000032424927) (35000000, 22.187999963760376) (40000000, 25.358999967575073) (45000000, 28.530999898910522) (50000000, 31.703000068664551) (55000000, 34.858999967575073) (60000000, 38.030999898910522) * 62410138 62410139 * * 62414887 62414888 * * 62415540 62415541 * * 62420289 62420290 * * 62420942 62420943 * * 62421595 62421596 * * 62422248 62422249 * * 62422901 62422902 * * 62427650 62427651 * * 62428303 62428304 * (65000000, 41.233999967575073) (70000000, 44.437999963760376) (75000000, 47.625) (80000000, 50.828000068664551) (85000000, 54.016000032424927) ('total lines read ', 85014950) 54.0309998989 ==> end of line not read for 10 lines in the middle of the file ! NTFS file system best Richard |
|||
msg55828 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * | Date: 2007-09-11 17:36 | |
Folks, please focus on one issue at a time, and don't post such long transcripts. I know Py3k text I/O is very slow; it's written in Python and uses UTF-8 as the default encoding. We've got a summer of code student working on an accelerating this. (And if he doesn't finish we have another year to work on it before 3.0final is released.) So the real problem is that on Windows in 2.x reading files > 4 GB loses data. Please try to see if opening the file in binary mode still loses data. I suspect a problem in the Windows C stdio library related to line endings, but who knows. |
|||
msg55837 - (view) | Author: christen (Richard.Christen@unice.fr) | Date: 2007-09-12 06:10 | |
Bug is still there but pb is solved, simply use oepn('file', 'U') see outputs : fichin=open('test.txt','U') ===> (2, 5, 0, 'final', 0) 2007-09-12 08:00:43 (5000000, 9.312000036239624) (10000000, 22.312000036239624) (15000000, 35.094000101089478) (20000000, 47.812000036239624) (25000000, 60.562000036239624) (30000000, 73.265000104904175) (35000000, 85.953000068664551) (40000000, 98.672000169754028) (45000000, 111.35900020599365) (50000000, 123.98400020599365) (55000000, 136.625) (60000000, 149.26500010490417) (65000000, 161.9060001373291) (70000000, 174.625) (75000000, 187.29700016975403) (80000000, 199.89000010490417) (85000000, 212.5310001373291) ('total lines read ', 85014960) 212.562000036 now with fichin=open('test.txt') or fichin=open('test.txt','r') ===> (2, 5, 0, 'final', 0) 2007-09-12 08:04:48 (5000000, 3.187999963760376) (10000000, 6.3440001010894775) (15000000, 9.4690001010894775) (20000000, 12.594000101089478) (25000000, 15.719000101089478) (30000000, 18.844000101089478) (35000000, 21.969000101089478) (40000000, 25.094000101089478) (45000000, 28.219000101089478) (50000000, 31.344000101089478) (55000000, 34.469000101089478) (60000000, 37.594000101089478) * 62410138 62410139 * * 62414887 62414888 * * 62415540 62415541 * * 62420289 62420290 * * 62420942 62420943 * * 62421595 62421596 * * 62422248 62422249 * * 62422901 62422902 * * 62427650 62427651 * * 62428303 62428304 * (65000000, 40.75) (70000000, 43.953000068664551) (75000000, 47.125) (80000000, 50.328000068664551) (85000000, 53.516000032424927) ('total lines read ', 85014950) 53.5160000324 best Richard |
|||
msg55841 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * | Date: 2007-09-12 14:40 | |
Cool. This helps track down the bug a bit more; it's either in (our routine) getline_via_fgets or it's in Microsoft's text mode line end translation (which universal newlines bypasses). I'm assigning this to Tim Peters, who probably still has a Windows box and once optimized the snot out of this code. |
|||
msg63808 - (view) | Author: Sean Reifschneider (jafo) * | Date: 2008-03-17 23:48 | |
I have run this under the current py3k SVN version on an 64-bit Linux (Fedora 8), and it runs fine, FYI. ISTR that I had a patch which fixed something that sounds very much like this, but I can't find that other issue. |
|||
msg116717 - (view) | Author: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc (amaury.forgeotdarc) * | Date: 2010-09-17 20:20 | |
issue1744752 describes why it's probably a bug in the C library. possible workarounds are to open the files in universal mode, to use io.open(), or to switch to python 3! |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-11 14:56:26 | admin | set | github: 45483 |
2010-09-17 20:20:20 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + amaury.forgeotdarc messages: + msg116717 superseder: Newline skipped in "for line in file" for huge file resolution: wont fix |
2010-08-06 16:53:02 | gvanrossum | set | nosy:
- gvanrossum |
2010-08-06 15:22:17 | tim.golden | set | nosy:
+ tim.golden |
2009-05-12 13:30:39 | ajaksu2 | set | nosy:
+ pitrou, benjamin.peterson versions: + Python 2.6, Python 3.1, - Python 2.5 components: + IO stage: test needed |
2008-03-17 23:48:17 | jafo | set | priority: normal nosy: + jafo messages: + msg63808 |
2007-09-12 14:40:25 | gvanrossum | set | assignee: tim.peters messages: + msg55841 nosy: + tim.peters |
2007-09-12 06:10:52 | Richard.Christen@unice.fr | set | files:
+ christen.vcf messages: + msg55837 |
2007-09-11 17:36:47 | gvanrossum | set | messages:
+ msg55828 components: - Interpreter Core versions: - Python 3.0 |
2007-09-11 06:18:19 | Richard.Christen@unice.fr | set | files:
+ christen.vcf messages: + msg55813 |
2007-09-11 05:29:32 | pythonmeister | set | messages: + msg55810 |
2007-09-10 21:55:29 | gvanrossum | set | nosy:
+ gvanrossum messages: + msg55801 |
2007-09-10 21:04:34 | pythonmeister | set | title: code sample showing errors reading large files with py 2.5 -> code sample showing errors reading large files with py 2.5/3.0 components: + Interpreter Core versions: + Python 3.0 |
2007-09-10 21:03:55 | pythonmeister | set | nosy:
+ pythonmeister messages: + msg55794 |
2007-09-10 15:54:06 | Richard.Christen@unice.fr | set | messages: + msg55786 |
2007-09-10 15:52:42 | Richard.Christen@unice.fr | create |