Consider the following:
python code:
class my_array( ctypes.Array ):
    _type_    = ctypes.c_uint8
    _length_  = 256

class my_array2( my_array ):
    pass

Output:
class my_array2( my_array ):
AttributeError: class must define a '_length_' attribute, which must be a positive integer


This is analogous to the C code
typedef char my_array[ 256 ];
typedef my_array my_array2;

However, the python code raises exceptions claiming _type_ and _length_ have not been defined.  This seems like a bug.  I shouldn't need to redefine _type_ and _length_, otherwise there was no point in subclassing my_array.

I tried to step into this using pdb but didn't have any luck.

Verified that this is still broken in the main development branch.  
The base type should be checked for '_type_' or '_length_' before throwing
an error.  Attached is a patch that fixes the problem and adds covering
tests.  The full test suite passed on OS X 10.6.5 and I ran
'./python.exe -m test -R : -v test_ctype' to verify that I didn't
introduce any resource leaks.

In the patch, _length_ is searched in the class and its base class. But what happens with a third level?
class my_array3(my_array2):
    pass

> But what happens with a third level?

That doesn't work.  I have a test case for that, but the test case has
a typo that caused it to pass.  I will fix the test case and the code.
Thanks.

Amaury, how about this patch?  I got rid of querying the type dictionary and hoisted the creation of the type instance earlier.  Then 'PyObject_GetAttrString' can be used to lookup '_length_' and '_type_' by the regular Python attribute lookup rules.  I extended the test cases to cover more error paths as well.

Yes, the patch looks good!

This patch was marked as accepted, but it doesn't seem to be committed.  Will someone commit it?

New changeset 5e23532f694d by Amaury Forgeot d'Arc in branch '3.2':
Issue #11241: subclasses of ctypes.Array can now be subclassed.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5e23532f694d

Thanks a lot for committing this for me Amaury.