When reading over the sorting howto, I noticed redundancy of the form “the list.sort() method of a list”.  Raymond, if you approve the attached patch, please assign back to me.  There were no warnings during doc build and no link was broken.

Note that :meth:`list.sort` (or :meth:`~list.sort`) does not trigger a link to the doc of the method, since sort is not marked up with a method directive but listed in a table alongside other list and bytearray methods (http://docs.python.org/dev/library/stdtypes#typesseq-mutable).  This table is preceded by index-generating markup, but it does not create a target for :meth:`list.sort`; that’s a separate issue.  Until it’s solved, the sorting howto could turn the first occurrence of “list” into a link to the right section, using :ref:`typesseq-mutable <list>`, or continue to live without a link to list or list.sort.

You can put in the backslashes before the two periods, but not the other changes.  I want the method names to continue to be spelled-out in full so that it is more clear what they are referring to.  Even in spoken English, I typically say "list sort" or "sort method of the builtin list type".  This helps distinguish it from the sorted() builtin.

I do think that "list.sort() method of a list" is a bit too much.

Made some tweaks r88358.  Sorry, I'm leaving the list.sort references as-is.  I consider them to be important in a document that needs to clearly differentiate list.sort from __builtin__.sorted().