Issue1079011
Created on 2004-12-04 19:44 by gerrit, last changed 2004-12-19 20:47 by rhettinger.
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg23538 - (view) | Author: Gerrit Holl (gerrit) | Date: 2004-12-04 19:44 | |
Comparing complex numbers with cmp yields: >>> cmp(1+3j, 1+3j) 0 >>> cmp(1+3j, 3+4j) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? TypeError: cannot compare complex numbers using <, <=, >, >= Well, I didn't use <, <=, > or >=. It's not a major bug, but it doesn't look too nice... would it be possible to return NotImplemented? Or would that be semantically incorrect? |
|||
| msg23539 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) | Date: 2004-12-10 17:31 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=80475 That is incorrect be == and != are implemented. The message is slightly weird but still helpful. Any rewording I can think of makes the message more obtuse, so I recommend leaving it alone and closing this bug. |
|||
| msg23540 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) | Date: 2004-12-19 20:47 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=80475 Rewrote the error message. See Objects/complexobject.c 2.73 and 2.72.2.1 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2004-12-04 19:44:05 | gerrit | create | |