Created on 2010-11-29 14:09 by eric.araujo, last changed 2010-11-29 16:35 by tarek. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg122801 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) *  |
Date: 2010-11-29 14:09 | |
In distutils2, we have a mock PyPI server to test index-related behavior, but in distutils we fix such things without automated tests. I would like to add the mock server to distutils. |
|||
| msg122808 - (view) | Author: Tarek Ziadé (tarek) * |
Date: 2010-11-29 15:12 | |
Please no more enhancements in distutils ! even in the tests. Distutils is on maintenance mode, and we need to do the bare minimum there. we need to do the minimum changes. If there's a bug in PyPI related code in distutils, you need to do this: - fix the bug in distutils2, with the mock server + a test - backport the bugfix only |
|||
| msg122821 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2010-11-29 15:58 | |
The more the codebases become different, the more difficult it will be to be sure some fix in d2 also fixes d1. I’ll live with it or use pypi_server on my own machine :) Thanks for the pronouncement. |
|||
| msg122826 - (view) | Author: Tarek Ziadé (tarek) * |
Date: 2010-11-29 16:35 | |
I don't think this will be a huge problem, given the low amount of bugs we have for all code involving PyPI. Other bugfix can be backported w/ their tests most of the time. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-29 16:35:09 | tarek | set | messages: + msg122826 |
| 2010-11-29 15:58:01 | eric.araujo | set | status: open -> closed messages: + msg122821 stage: committed/rejected |
| 2010-11-29 15:29:22 | eric.araujo | link | issue10571 dependencies |
| 2010-11-29 15:12:36 | tarek | set | resolution: wont fix messages: + msg122808 |
| 2010-11-29 14:09:31 | eric.araujo | create | |