Created on 2004-08-12 14:53 by jackdied, last changed 2005-01-04 17:59 by jackdied. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| class_decorators.diff | jackdied, 2004-08-12 14:53 | @ decorator patch, now with classes | ||
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg46685 - (view) | Author: Jack Diederich (jackdied) *  |
Date: 2004-08-12 14:53 | |
This patch is modeled on the original @ patch #979728 Functions are now ignorant of their decorated status. The regular function & class functions are called from the com_decorated_thing() function which applies the decorators. the new Grammar production is decorated_thing: decorators (funcdef|classdef) passes all tests (including augmented test_decorators) com_decorated_thing() in compile.c uses a VAR_LOAD to get the class/function to decorate. There is probably an easier way to do this. I updated the compiler package (ast.txt, pycodegen.py, symbols.py, transformer.py) and it passes all tests but I'm not sure it is correct (the tests pass as long as they don't throw an exception). |
|||
| msg46686 - (view) | Author: Jack Diederich (jackdied) * |
Date: 2005-01-04 17:59 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=591932 Closed the patch and marked it "postponed" I'd like to see class decorators in 2.5, I'll submit another patch at a later time (when hopefully more people are clamoring for it). |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2004-08-12 14:53:14 | jackdied | create | |